🔗 Share this article

Police forces across the United Kingdom effectively campaigned to deploy a facial recognition system acknowledged as biased against females, young people, and individuals from ethnic minority groups, following complaints that a less biased version produced a reduced number of potential suspects.

The Technology in Practice

UK forces use the national police database to conduct retrospective facial recognition searches. This procedure entails matching a reference photograph of a person of interest against a database of more than 19 million custody photos to find possible hits.

Acknowledged Discrimination

The Home Office admitted last week that the technology was biased. This acknowledgment came after a study by the National Physical Laboratory (NPL) determined it incorrectly matched people of Black and Asian heritage and females at much greater frequency than white men. The ministry stated it “took steps on the findings”.

“This raises the issue of whether this technology only becomes effective if users accept biases in ethnicity and gender. Convenience is a poor argument for disregarding fundamental rights.”

Long-Standing Problem

Internal documents reveal that this discriminatory flaw has been known about for more than a year. Furthermore, law enforcement argued to overturn an earlier ruling that was designed to mitigate the problem.

Senior officers were notified of the system's bias in late 2024. The Home Office-commissioned NPL review concluded the system was had a higher probability to suggest false positives for photos of females, individuals of Black ethnicity, and those under 40 years old.

A Reversed Decision

In response, the national police leadership body ordered that the confidence threshold required for potential matches be raised to a point where the bias was greatly diminished.

However, this directive was overturned the following month following complaints from police that the adjusted system was producing fewer “investigative leads”. Internal records show the stricter setting cut the number of queries that yielded possible identifications from 56% to a just 14%.

Severe Disparities

Although the Home Office and NPCC refused to say what threshold is now in operation, the recent independent review found the system could generate false positives for women of Black heritage almost 100 times more frequently than for white women at certain settings.

The ministry commented on these results: “Our evaluation found that in a specific scenarios the software is more likely to wrongly flag some population segments in its search results.”

Balancing Utility and Fairness

Describing the effect of the brief increase to the system's accuracy setting, the police records state: “This adjustment greatly lessens the impact of bias across legally safeguarded attributes of race, generation and gender but had a significant negative impact on operational effectiveness”. The documents further note that forces argued that “a previously useful tool returned results of limited benefit”.

Wider Implementation Proposals

Meanwhile, the UK administration has opened a two-and-a-half-month public review on its proposals to widen the use of biometric scanning systems. Policing minister the relevant minister has labeled the tool as the “most significant advance since DNA matching”.

Expert and Oversight Concerns

Abimbola Johnson, head of the advisory panel for the police race action plan, commented: “There was scant discussion in equality strategy sessions of the technology deployment despite clear relevance with the strategy's goals.

“This disclosure demonstrate once again that the anti-racism commitments the police has made through the equality initiative are failing to be integrated into broader operations. Our reports have warned that innovative tools are being implemented in a context where ethnic inequalities, weak scrutiny and faulty information gathering already persist.

“All deployment of facial recognition must adhere to strict national standards, be independently scrutinised, and prove it diminishes rather than exacerbates ethnic bias.”

Home Office Response

A Home Office spokesperson stated: “We treat the findings of the report seriously and we have already taken action. A new algorithm has been independently tested and procured, which has demonstrated no measurable discrimination. It will be tested early next year and will be subject to further assessment.

“The foremost aim is protecting the public. This revolutionary tool will assist officers to apprehend and prosecute offenders. There is officer review in each stage of the process and no further action would be pursued without specialist personnel meticulously examining the results.”